An Argument in Support of Metal Radio Frequency Lasers: Are They Really the “Best?”

Are metal lasers better than glass lasers? Enthusiasts often prefer how metal lasers work, and the performance creates what many would argue is a better output. If anything, RF metal lasers represent the future of lasers or, at the least, the present.

In general circles, many people see glass and Direct Current lasers as the former approach. It is the outmoded strategy, according to a few pure-blooded elitists. The argument follows that it is sometimes seen as a dated model for laser etching. On a purely functional level, metal lasers seem to boast a better performance and design. The core performance is as follows.

How a Radio Frequency Laser Creates a Laser

A tube is contained within the metal framework. The gas is transferred into energy using a pulsating radio frequency. This allows for a few things. Firstly, users can actually dial in the laser using the frequency of the adjustment.

The laser arises as a pulse-like source, which greatly diminishes the rate of charge. Consider it like the machine gun of lasers. Once it is applied with the right frequency, users can discharge at will. This quick repeatability is why many enthusiasts see metal and radio-based lasers as the de-facto future.

Price Matters

There is, of course, a matter of price. This can be rather telling. Metal lasers based on a radio frequency design cost a healthy chunk of change. Typically, consumers can get a glass tube at about 10% of the metal laser tube price. This may seem marginal, but consider how some providers need hundreds of them, and it adds up. On a pure price level, many consumers prefer glass.

That can shed a little light on the perceived quality and why so many prefer metal. The cost hike can offer the economic illusion of better quality. All it really attests to is the cost of production. Both glass and metal perform quite similarly. Which is better? Both or neither. The cost difference is the only substantial difference in actual quality between these two laser types. The other differences are subtle in the final outcome but different in how they actually develop the laser.